POST-SECULAR HUMANITIES
 
               
  RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD  | 
              
              
              
              
            
            
              
                Spring 2016 - Wednesday  4:30 PM-7:20 PM - bldg. 50-52E 
                  Stanford University, Anthro 340A - French 341A - REES 340A [5 units] 
                Ewa Domanska  
               
                | 
            
            
              DESCRIPTION 
                The term “Postsecularism” refers to various theories  and approaches regarding the revival of religion (various religious beliefs and  practices) in the present as well as current reevaluations of the relationship  between "faith and reason" in knowledge building. The  "post" refers to the era after the process of secularization  following the Enlightenment in the West (for some scholars postsecularism  presupposes the failure of secularization). The so-called post-secular turn  became especially visible after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center  in 2001 and soon became a popular subject in works by sociologists, political  theorists, scholars in religious studies, art studies, and literary studies  (Giorgio Agamben, Talal Asad, Alain Badiou, Rosi Braidotti, Judith Butler,  Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, Slavoy Žižek – to mention  only a few).  
                The  postsecular might be defined more broadly as a renewed openness to questions of  spirituality. When thinking about a postsecular humanities, we would on the one  hand follow scholars that are usually associated with this trend (like Agamben,  Badiou, Derrida, Habermas), as well as discuss the problem of rethinking  secularism in the post-secular world, the impact of a post-secular turn in the  humanities and social sciences, post-secular art and aesthetics, the possibility of buidling  a post-secular theory (and criticism), the  relationship  between postsecularism and postcolonialism, green theology and animal theology,  a growing interest in the new animism in the context of discussions about  epistemic justice and postsecularism, on the other. In such a context,  postsecularism might be understood as a move "beyond secularity" and  as a positive opening of the humanities to various forms of spirituality, alternative  rationality, and non-scientific approaches to the study of reality. The  postsecular turn in the humanities allows us to treat religions and beliefs as  a source of alternative knowledges and wisdom as well as to discuss the problem  of religion as adaptation in the framework of the cognitive science of  religion. The course will consider how the interactions and collisions among  various worldviews can provoke the rethinking of the key ideas of our times:  what it means to be secular, religious, a citizen, a hybrid, an indigene, a  non-human. 
              The course  promotes a transdisciplinary, comparative approach and integrated  cross-regional and cross-cultural studies. This course is a research seminar  designed to help students work on papers for other classes, theses and  individual projects. It serves as an introduction to discussions about the  "return" of religion and various beliefs in the public sphere (and  academia) from a perspective of postsecularism and stresses an awareness of how  to draw on and combine these approaches for analyzing the student's  own  research materials. It advocates a ground-up approach to theory building, and  thus it also teaches students how to formulate their own interpretative  categories and small range theories based on case study analysis.  | 
            
            
              |   | 
            
            COURSE REQUIREMENTS  
                Attendance is mandatory. Students who miss more than three meetings  (except for illness or other serious matters) will not be graded. Students are  expected to read assigned readings carefully and participate in discussions.  Each student will sign up to present a text relevant to the the m e of the  readings for that week. Class presentations will be limited to 10-15 minutes. A  15 page final paper is required. Its topic will be chosen by the student hi m  self/herself. It can draw upon work being done in other classes but must  utilize the materials of this course as well. Grading: participation - 40%;  class presentation - 20%; final paper - 40%.  | 
            
            COURSE SCHEDULE  
                March 30 
                  1. Introduction: Overview of the Course 
              April 6 
                2. Are we Living in a Post-Secular World? 
              Michael  Rectenwald and Rochelle Almeida, "Introduction: Global Secularisms in a Post-Secular  Age," in Global Secularisms in a  Post-Secular Age, ed. by Michael Rectenwald and Rochelle Almeida. Walter de  Gruyter, 2015: 1-24. 
              Philip  S. Gorski, David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey, and Jonathan VanAnwerpen, “The  Post-Secular in Question,” in Post-Secular  in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society, ed. by Philip S. Gorski,  David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey. New York: Nw York University Press, 2012: 1-22.  
              Jürgen  Habermas, “Notes on a Postsecular Society.” New Perspectives Quarterly, vol.  25, no. 4, Fall 2008: 17-29. 
              Arie L. Molendijk, “In Pursuit  of the Postsecular.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, vol. 76,  no. 2. 2015: 100-115 [special issue: Making Sense of the Postsecular.  Theological Explorations of a Critical Concept, ed. By Petruschka Schaafsma.] 
              Charles  Taylor. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard  University Press, 2007: 1-22, 351–376, 618–675. 
              Cesare  Merlini, “A Post-Secular World?”. Survival, vol. 53, no. 2, 2011: 117-130. 
              Ananda  Abeysekara , The Politics of Postsecular  Religion: Mourning Secular Futures. New York: Columbia University Press,  2008. 
              April 13 
                3. Rethinking Secularism 
              José Casanova,   “Secularization,” in International  Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, ed. by Neil J. Smelser  and Paul B. Baltes. Amsterdam, Paris et.al.: Elsevier, 2001: 13786-13791. 
              Talal Asad,  “Introduction: Thinking about Secularism” and Chapter 1: “What Might an  Anthropology                  of  Secularism Look Like?”, in his, Formations  of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity.                Stanford:  Stanford University Press, 2003: 1-66. 
              José  Casanova, “Secularization Revisited: A Reply to Talal Asad,” in Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, ed. by  David Scott and Charles Hirschkind. Stanford  University Press,                  2006: 12-30.  
              Charles  Taylor, “Modes of Secularism,” in Secularism  and Its Critics, ed. by Rajeev Bhargava. New York: Oxford University Press,  1998: 31-53. 
              Akeel  Bilgrami, “Secularism: Its Content and Context” SSRC Working Paper. 2008. 
              Charles  Taylor “Why We Need a Radical Reconceptualization of Secularism,” in The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere. New  York: Columbia University Press, 2011: 34-59. 
              Peter J. Katzenstein,   "Multiple Modernities as Limits to Secular Europeanization?,"  in Religion in an Expanding Europe,  ed. by Timothy A. Byrnes and Peter J. Katzenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University  Press, 2006, 1-33. 
              Nicos  Mouzelis, “Modernity and the Secularization Debate.” Sociology, vol. 46, no. 2,  April 2012: 207-223. 
              April 20 
                4. Post-Secular Turn in the Humanities and  Social Sciences 
              Gregor  McLennon, “The Postsecular Turn.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 27, no.  4, 2010: 3-20. 
              Khaled  Furani, “Is There a Postsecular?” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol.  83, no. 1, March 2015: 1-26. 
              Rosi  Braidotti, “In Spite of the Times. The Postsecular Turn in Feminism.” Theory,  Culture and Society, vol. 25, no. 6, 2008: 1-24. 
              Tracy  Fessenden, “The Problem of the Postsecular.” American Literary History, vol. 26,  no. 1, Spring 2014: 154-167. 
              Gregor  McLennan, “Towards Postsecular Sociology?” Sociology, vol. 41, no. 5, 2007:  857–870. 
              Birgitte  Schepelern Johansen,  “Post-Secular Sociology.”  Approaching Religion, vol. 3, no. 1, 2013: 4-15. 
              Philip  Fountain, “Toward a Post-Secular Anthropology.”   The Australian Journal of Anthropology, vol. 24, 2013: 310-328. 
              Graham  Ward, “Theology and Postmodernism: Is It All Over?” Journal of the American  Academy of Religion, vol. 80, no. 2, 2012: 466–484. 
              Jonathan  Sterne, “The Theology of Sound: A Critique of Orality.” Canadian Journal of  Communication, vol. 36, 2011: 207-225. 
              April 27 
                5. Post-Secular Art and Aesthetics 
              Abou Farman,  “Towards a Post-Secular Aesthetics: Provocations for Possible Media in Afterlife  Art.” e-flux journal, vol. 45, May 2013. 
              Mike King, “Art  and the Postsecular.” Journal of Visual Art Practice, vol. 4, no. 1, 2005:  3-17. 
              Jennifer  Scheper Hughes, “Mysterium Materiae:  Vital Matter and the Object as Evidence in the Study of Religion.” Bulletin for  the Study of Religion, vol. 41, no. 4, November 2012: 16-24. 
              Anne-Marie  Korte, “Blasphemous Feminist Art: Incarnate Politics of Identity in Postsecular  Perspective,” in Transformations of  Religion and the Public Sphere, Rosi Braidotti et al. (eds.),                  Palgrave  Macmillan, 2014: 228-248.  
              May 4 
                6. Postsecular Theory and Criticism 
              Rosi  Braidotti, “Conclusion: The Residual Spirituality in Critical Theory: A Case  for Affirmative Postsecular  Politics,” in Transformations of Religion  and the Public Sphere,  ed. by Rosi  Braidotti, Bolette Blaagaard, Tobijn de Graauw, Eva Midden. Palgrave Macmillan,  2014: 249-272. 
              Matthew C. Watson, "On Multispecies                Mythology: A Crtique                of Animal Anthropology." Theory, Culture & Society, 2016. 
              Rosa  Vasilaki, “The Politics of Postsecular Feminism.” Theory, Culture & Society,                vol. 33,  no. 2, 2016: 103-123. 
Alex  Cistelecan, “The Theological Turn of Contemporary Critical Theory.” Telos 167,  Summer 2014: 8-26. 
Talal Asad,  Judith Butler, Wendy Brown, Saba Mahmood, Is  Critique Secular?: Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. University of  California Press, 2010. 
Graham Ward, Theology and Contemporary Critical Theory. 2nd edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 1999. 
“Is  Critique Secular?” SSRC Blog 
Elaine  Graham, “Manifestations of the Posthuman in the Postsecular Imagination,” in: Perfecting Human Futures. Transhuman Visions  and Technological Imaginations, ed. by J. Benjamin Hurlbut  and Hava Tirosh-Samuelson. Springer, 2016: 51-72. 
Allan Megill, “History, Theoreticism, and the Limits of ‘the Postsecular’.” History and Theory, vol. 52, no. 1, February 2013: 110-129. 
May 11 
  7. Post-Secular Animism and Epistemic Justice 
              Walter D.  Mignolo, “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-Colonial Freedom.”  Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, no. 7–8, 2009: 1–23. 
              Dave  Aftandilian, “Toward a Native American Theology of Animals: Creek and Cherokee  Perspectives.” CrossCurrents, vol. 61, no. 2, June 2011: 191–207. 
              Graham  Harvey, Animism. Respecting the Living  World. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006: xi-29; 99-120; 179-212 
              Harry  Garuba, "On Animism, Modernity/Colonialism, and the African Order of Knowledge:  Provisional Reflections." e-flux, #36, July 2012. 
              Nurit Bird-David, "‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational  Epistemology." Current Anthropology, vol. 40, February 1999: 567-591.  
              The Handbook of Contemporary Animism, ed. by Graham Harvey. Acumen  Publishing, 2013 (fragments). 
              Ernst  Halbmayer, Debating Animism, Perspectivism, and the Construction of Ontologies  (Berlin, 2012) INDIANA 29: 9-23. 
              Africa  and the Future: An Interview with Achille Mbembe               May 19 
8. Is the Postcolonial Postsecular? 
special guest: Dipesh Chakrabarty
              Dipesh  Chakrabarty, "Minority Histories, Subaltern Pasts," in his, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought  and Historical Difference. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press,  2000: 97-113. 
              ---, "Subaltern  Histories and Post-Enlightenment Rationalism" in his, Habitations of Modernity. Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies.  Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2002: 20-37. 
              ---, “The  Modern and the Secular in the West: An Outsider’s View” (a review essay on  Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age).  Journal of the American Academy of Religions, no. 77, 1 June 2009: 393-409. 
              Vincent  William Lloyd and Ludger Viefhues-Bailey, "Introduction: Is the Postcolonial  Postsecular?" Critical Research on Religion, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015: 13-24 [Special  Issue: Is the Postcolonial Postsecular?] 
              Bruce  Robbins, "Is the Postcolonial Also Postsecular?" boundary 2, vol. 40, no. 1,  2013: 245-262. 
              Graham  Huggan, Is the “Post” in “Postsecular” the “Post” in “Postcolonial”? Modern  Fiction Studies, vol. 56, no. 4, Winter 2010: 751-768. 
              Eric  Bugyis, "Postsecularism as colonialism by  other means." Critical Research on Religion, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015: 25–40. 
              Satish  Kolluri, Ali Mir, “Redifining Secularism in Postcolonial Context.” Cultural  Dynamics, vol. 14, no, 1, 2002: 7–20. 
              Manav Ratti, The Postsecular Imagination.  Postcolonialism, Religion and Literature. New York & Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2013. 
              May 25 
                9. Religion as an Adaptation 
                guest participant: Martin  Fortier 
              Helen De  Cruz, Ryan Nichols, “Introduction. Cognitive Science of Religion and Its Philosophical  Implications,” in: Advances in Religion,  Cognitive Science, and Experimental Philosophy, ed. by Helen De Cruz, Ryan  Nichols. Bloomsbury, 2016: 1-17.  
              David Sloan  Wilson and William Scott Green, “Evolutionary Religious Studies (ERS): A  Beginner’s Guide.” 2007  
              Dominic D.  P. Johnson, “Anthropology: Hand of the Gods in Human Civilization.” Nature, vol.  530, no. 7589, 10 February 2016.    
              Stewart  Guthrie, “Animal Animism: Evolutionary Roots of Religious Cognition,” in: Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science  of Religion, ed. by Ilkka Pyysiäinen and Veikko Anttonen. New York:  Continuum, 2002: 38-67. June 1                
                10. Postsecular Nature / Green and Animal Theology
                Patrick M. Curry,  “Post-Secular Nature: Principles and Politics.”   Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, vol. 11, no. 3, 2007: 284-304. 
              Pope  Francis, On Care for Our Common Home (Laudato  Si')  
              Denise  Kimber Buell, “The Microbes and Pneuma That Therefore I Am,”  in Divinanimality:  Animal Theory, Creaturely Theology, ed. by Stephen Moore. New York: Fordham  University Press, 2014: 63-87. 
              Andrew  Linzey, Creatures of the Same God:  Explorations in Animal Theology. Winchester University Press, 2007: 49-113. 
              Donovan O.  Schaefer, “Do Animals Have Religion? Interdisciplinary Perspectives on  Religion and Embodiment.” Anthrozoös, vol. 25, supplement, 2012: 173-189.  |